12 Angry Men: Jury’s Conflict Involved on Verdict Essay

Any instrument panel trial is bound to have rough sort of appointment concern when coming to a verdict. The portrayal of a murder case in the movie, 12 Angry Men, involves galore(postnominal) assorted theoretical accounts of conflict, as well as the antennaes to conflict used by polar characters. Almost every talk in the film involves conflict, since the characters argon all debating whether or not the male child being tried for murder is guilty or not, but at that place are a few scenes in which different types of conflict and different approaches to conflict seem to stand out.The room in which the men are sitting and debating the case has a table with each of the men sitting around it. Jury extremity numerate one, who sits at the head of the table, takes on the role as the leader of the discussion by formatting how the balloting goes and asking all fragments whether they agree to either decisions made. In one scene, the sr. musical composition with the summer f rigorific comes over to dialog box member tally one and tells, stop being a kid. K. I. D. Kid. Jury member number one opposes, Just because I am trying to keep this affaire organized? Here, you take the responsibility. Ill precisely keep my mouth shut, thats all. This scene is an example of ego/Identity conflict because of the beliefs that the man with the cold sees gore member number one as being a kid because he is younger than him. Jury member number one seemed to take the responsibility of leading the group just because of his number, but the man with the cold seemed to get upset and create a conflict with him because of his age.See moreSocial Satire in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn seeThe different types of characters in the jury decision create many different examples of approaches to conflict. Jury member number two, the quiet man with the glasses, becomes the target of many of the other characters. When the men are all going around and explaining their reasons for why they feel the boy is guilty, Jury member number terce interrupts and says, what near the switch-knife found in the mans chest? Jury member number two says, Wait a second, there are some plurality who havent talked yet, shouldnt we go in assemble? Jury member number three says, forget about the people who havent gone yet, be quiet will ya? This causes jury member number two to quiet down and not respond. This approach to conflict is an example of competing because of the win-lose outcome of the conflict. Jury member number three makes sure that he uses his alpha male status and shuts down jury member number two without any complaint.The last situation is an example of conflict as well as the approach to conflict. When the men assume to make an anonymous vote and one of them writes not guilty on the paper, jury member number three calls out the man who had big(a) up in the slums and says that he changed his vote because he fell for the discourse of the first member who felt the boy was not guilty. After holler at the man, the old man finally admits to changing is vote. Later, jury member number three attempts to apologize for calling out the man who grew up in the slums and he just walks right past him without responding. This is an example of Ego/Identity conflict because jury member number three judged the man who grew up in the slums and expected him to change his vote because of his past. The approach to the conflict later is avoidance because the man who grew up in the slums chooses to not respond to the apology and walk right past the man without getting into any type of conflict.